Agenda

The Vocabulary of Standards

The objective of this short and intense conference is to examine a vocabulary and mode of decision-making, particularly the mode of arriving at critical standards as they pervade new information technologies. In terms of deliverables, we hope a) to have a book which contains the papers prepared for the conference, in addition to other contributions; b) possibly a terse concluding paper, at the end of the conference, that sets forth a direction, priorities, and modes of proceeding; c) a stronger network of concern about shaping of standards.

The agenda follows with this caveat: one aspiration of the purpose of the conference is to shake up or revise thinking about standards and especially to rethink what is meant by increasing public participation in the formation of standards that strongly affect social structures. We've gathered together what we think is a distinguished group, experienced in the existing vocabulary of standards. We want to be structured but also open, both at the conference and before it in terms of suggestions about the agenda or your particular contributions. This will not be a conference which is structured wholly or largely by the giving of papers and commenting on them. The papers are framing documents and instigations for conversation.


December 7, 2003

8:00 p.m.
Informal session, cocktails, introductions

December 8, 2003

Session 1: 9:30-11:00
The first session will set the tone for this process of reexamination. We intend to go around the room and ask each person to provide a two or three minute view on which angle or angles he or she thinks vital for assessing and reassessing the standards setting process. We would appreciate it if each of you sent us electronically a version of this presentation and we would circulate it to participants before the meeting.

Session 2: 11:00-12:30
In this session, we wish to examine strategic questions: how are or should areas of standard-setting be prioritized in terms of scrutiny or involvement. Are there analytical models, within industrial sectors or categories of software for determining strategies for the allocation of resources in the enhancement of standards? Is there a taxonomy of standards within or cross sectors in terms of their importance for society). Are there differentiated leverage points which establish priorities, or does it have to do with organization of society or structure of an industry? Are there standards that, as gatekeepers, should stand in a separate category for public interest scrutiny? How should those who wish to allocate resources for public interest involvement in standard setting determine opportunities that increase impact?

Session 3: 2:00-3:30
Based on the work of the morning, we should continue looking at case studies, illustration of sectors to establish some more sophisticated mode of thinking about who sets standards, how and where. What are the given polarities and are they the exclusive or correct ones: (Developing v. Developed) (Public v. Private) (Open v. Closed). What specific case studies are subjects of papers for this workshop or what case studies should be commissioned?

Session 4: 4:30-6:00
Towards Procedural Justice in Standard Setting: Processes, procedures and values in standard setting (Transparency, Participation, Efficiency, Ethics in the standard setting process). Here, too, there should be a case study based discussion of determining preferred models for participation and identification of standard-setting venues that require differentiated levels of public interest attention.

December 9, 2003

Session 1: 9:00-10:30

  • Innovation and Methodology: This section will try to draw together the observations and perceptions of the first day into specific areas for moving forward. These will include exploring innovative ways to define and redefine standards, and ways to re-engage existing actors and determine modes of engaging non-actors. One focus will be on capacity-building strategies to broaden and enrich public debate.
  • Areas for research and advocacy
  • Systemic and Structural Interventions

Session 2: 11:00-1:00

Closure: A primer on Standard and Standard Setting - Discussion Draft

Lunch and End of Conference